RAMAPO VALLEY ROAD over MAHWAH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.10333, -74.1508341°06'12" N, 74°09'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | RAMAPO VALLEY ROAD over MAHWAH CREEK |
| Structure number: | 020033C |
| Location: | 0.7 MI N OF RT 17 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Total length: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1920 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1931 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Frame [07] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,842 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 62.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,155,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,571 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 61.4 tons [55.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.0 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,048 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 34.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $629,000 |