US 130 SOUTHBOUND over ASSISCUNK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.07444, -74.8488940°04'28" N, 74°50'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | US 130 SOUTHBOUND over ASSISCUNK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 0317152 |
| Location: | 0.5 MI N OF RT541 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 48.2 ft. [14.7 m] |
| Total length: | 104.0 ft. [31.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 4.9 ft. [1.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 20° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1935 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2006 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 23,282 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Inventory rating: | 83.8 tons [76.2 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $160,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 16,580 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge over "tidal" waters that has not been evaluated for scour, but considered low risk. [T] |
| Operating rating: | 57.4 tons [52.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $21,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 14,800 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 70.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $41,000 |