Share:

COUNTY ROUTE 646 over SALEM CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.65389, -75.40944
39°39'14" N, 75°24'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COUNTY ROUTE 646 over SALEM CREEK
Structure number:1704000
Location:PILESGROVE-1 MI SO NJ 40
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:174.9 ft. [53.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2005
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:760 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.4

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201599.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood760
October 201399.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood760
November 201199.5Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood732
December 200999.5Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood715
January 200899.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood840
April 200693.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood820
November 200559.2Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory780
September 200359.2Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory765
August 200159.2Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory765
September 200163.1Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory750
August 199963.1Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory750
May 199763.1Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory750
December 199447.6Structurally deficientFairSeriousSatisfactory740
October 199247.2Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory705
October 199068.7Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory705