SR 612 NELLIS BL over FLAMINGO WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+36.14194, -115.0652836°08'31" N, 115°03'55" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SR 612 NELLIS BL over FLAMINGO WASH |
| Structure number: | B1545 |
| Location: | LAS VEGAS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Total length: | 109.9 ft. [33.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 112.9 ft. [34.4 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1989 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 43,120 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Inventory rating: | 78.3 tons [71.2 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,792,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 39,200 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 64.4 tons [58.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 90.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,792,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 27,100 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 64.4 tons [58.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 93.8 |