Share:

RONEMUS DR. over CHEYENNE CHANNEL

Map 

Coordinates:
+36.21750, -115.25806
36°13'03" N, 115°15'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RONEMUS DR. over CHEYENNE CHANNEL
Structure number:B2147
Location:N.W LAS VEGAS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Total length:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,100 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:76.8 tons [69.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:97.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201597.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood1100
December 201397.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood1100
December 201197.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood1100
December 200997.8Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good1100
December 200797.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
December 200597.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1000
December 200397.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1000
September 200197.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood1000
May 200099.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1000