I 80 over CROSS ROAD

Map 

Facts 

Name:	I 80 over CROSS ROAD
Structure number:	H 902W
Location:	EAST OF ELKO
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01]
Length of largest span:	35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:	92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1968
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:	Slab [01]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Bituminous [6]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	4,125 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:	35% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	86.6 tons [78.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	51.7 tons [47.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	95.8

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	3,868 [as of 1996]
Truck traffic:	35% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	72.3 tons [65.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	91.8

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	2,785 [as of 1988]
Truck traffic:	35% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	72.3 tons [65.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	92.8

Comments