+43.58504, -73.86410
43°35'06" N, 73°51'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 28 over GLEN CREEK
Structure number:000000001020360
Location:0.3 MI NW JCT 28& HUDSONR
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:111.6 ft. [34.0 m]
Total length:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,442 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:81.8 tons [74.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,250,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201596.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3442
June 201396.2Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent3442
June 201196.2Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent3450
June 200995.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent4634
November 200730.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent4577
July 200635.2Structurally deficientFairPoorFair4577
August 200438.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair3045
September 200314.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousFair3045
August 200238.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair3045
August 200049.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair3728
October 199849.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair3728
July 199612.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor4188
October 199414.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor4188
November 199218.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2837
June 199021.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor2102