+40.74229, -73.82538
40°44'32" N, 73°49'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:MAIN STREET over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055129
Location:.6 MI E I495+RTE 678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Total length:127.0 ft. [38.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:103.0 ft. [31.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:28°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,066 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:78.9 tons [71.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:60.6
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$3,043,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201560.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair17066
July 201360.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair17066
July 201160.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair25040
May 200960.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair17066
May 200761.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair17066
May 200572.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood25040
July 200372.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood25040
August 200172.4Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood25040
August 199972.4Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood25040
December 199772.4Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory25040
November 199558.4Not deficientPoorFairFair19370
October 199360.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair19370
July 199224.7Structurally deficientFairFairSerious19370
October 199124.7Structurally deficientFairFairSerious19370