Share:

KISSENA BOULEVARD over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.73884, -73.81502
40°44'20" N, 73°48'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:KISSENA BOULEVARD over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055149
Location:1.2 MI SE JCT I495 & I678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:57.7 ft. [17.6 m]
Total length:125.0 ft. [38.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:103.0 ft. [31.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:23°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,691 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:81.8 tons [74.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.5
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$3,629,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201474.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood22691
March 201274.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood21400
April 201074.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood19852
April 200874.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood19852
February 200675.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood3265
January 200475.8Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood3265
March 200275.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood3265
January 200063.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair21513
February 199863.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair21513
February 199643.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor24057
February 199426.2Structurally deficientFairFairSerious15600
February 199246.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor15600
April 199046.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor15600