164TH STREET over RTE I495, RTE I495


+40.73846, -73.80457
40°44'18" N, 73°48'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:164TH STREET over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055169
Location:1.8 MI SE I495+RTE 678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Total length:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:79.1 ft. [24.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:105.0 ft. [32.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,790 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.3
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$3,230,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201593.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory13790
May 201493.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood13790
July 201393.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood13890
May 201292.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood21200
August 201192.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood21200
May 201093.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood20662
May 200892.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood21314
April 200694.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood20662
January 200494.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood20662
March 200294.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood20662
January 200093.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory20662
February 199893.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory20662
February 199663.0Structurally deficientFairPoorFair25944
February 199465.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair12500
February 199264.5Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor12500
April 199065.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor12500