Share:

RTE I295 over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74364, -73.77406
40°44'37" N, 73°46'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I295 over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055210
Location:JCT I495+I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Total length:111.9 ft. [34.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,877 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:100.8 tons [91.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$43,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201593.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17877
November 201393.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17877
August 201193.6Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good7833
August 200993.6Not deficientExcellentGoodVery Good7833
September 200793.6Not deficientExcellentGoodVery Good7833
September 200593.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good7833
October 200393.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good7833
March 200367.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory104589
February 200067.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory104589
March 199834.7Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor104589
April 199632.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor104589
March 199431.7Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor104589
March 199231.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor104589
May 199031.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor104589