Share:

RTE I495 over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74384, -73.77237
40°44'38" N, 73°46'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I495 over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055220
Location:JCT I495+I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:75.8 ft. [23.1 m]
Total length:147.0 ft. [44.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,776 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$206,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201591.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood4776
July 201391.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood4776
July 201193.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10615
May 200993.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10615
May 200793.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10615
April 200594.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood10615
April 200395.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood10615
May 200195.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood10615
February 199995.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3683
May 199795.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3683
May 199578.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair76120
May 199318.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySerious76120
June 199218.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySerious76120
October 199118.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySerious76120