RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295


+40.74416, -73.77143
40°44'39" N, 73°46'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295
Structure number:000000001055249
Location:JCT I495+I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Total length:132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:114.8 ft. [35.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:69,317 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:79.9 tons [72.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:69.6
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$10,493,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201569.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair69317
July 201369.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair69317
July 201169.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair67600
July 200980.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good118573
August 200781.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good118599
September 200580.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good161868
September 200380.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good161868
March 200359.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair161555
May 200060.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair151206
May 199860.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair152556
May 199639.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor157825
April 199439.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor145200
May 199239.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor173215
May 199041.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor173215