Share:

RTE I295 over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74519, -73.76929
40°44'43" N, 73°46'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I295 over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055260
Location:JCT I495+I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:73.8 ft. [22.5 m]
Total length:152.9 ft. [46.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,870 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:104.8 tons [95.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,455,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201574.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory5870
July 201374.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory5870
August 201169.9Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodSatisfactory78828
August 200969.9Not deficientExcellentGoodSatisfactory78828
September 200769.9Not deficientExcellentGoodGood78828
September 200572.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood78828
October 200371.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood78828
March 200356.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair78828
March 200058.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair78828
May 199858.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair78828
April 199634.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor78828
May 199434.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor78828
July 199217.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious78828
November 199032.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor78828