RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295, RTE


+40.74271, -73.77074
40°44'34" N, 73°46'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295, RTE
Structure number:000000001055289
Location:JCT I495+I295
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Total length:172.9 ft. [52.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:85.3 ft. [26.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,747 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:82.8 tons [75.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$8,331,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201593.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood5747
June 201393.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood5747
July 201190.3Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good76120
July 200990.3Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good76120
July 200790.3Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good76120
July 200590.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good76120
September 200390.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good76120
March 200359.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor76120
February 200059.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor76120
April 199876.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair76120
April 199650.9Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor76120
May 199452.8Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor76120
August 199255.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor76120
October 199052.8Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor76120