RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295, RTE


+40.74556, -73.77209
40°44'44" N, 73°46'20" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295, RTE
Structure number:000000001055290
Location:JCT I495+I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:77.8 ft. [23.7 m]
Total length:210.0 ft. [64.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.2 ft. [15.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:76,120 [as of 1989]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:86.8 tons [78.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,079,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201590.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good76120
June 201390.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good76120
July 201190.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good76120
July 200990.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good76120
July 200790.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good76120
July 200590.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good76120
September 200389.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good76120
March 200356.7Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor76120
May 200156.7Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor76120
March 200058.7Structurally deficientFairGoodPoor76120
April 199958.7Structurally deficientFairGoodPoor76120
July 199858.7Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor76120
July 199739.7Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious76120
July 199632.6Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious76120
May 199532.7Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious76120
May 199433.6Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious76120
June 199233.6Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious76120
October 199128.2Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious76120