Share:

EAST HAMPTON BLVD over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.75201, -73.74684
40°45'07" N, 73°44'49" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:EAST HAMPTON BLVD over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055340
Location:.2 MI SW JCT CI PKWY&I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Total length:131.9 ft. [40.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.7 ft. [24.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,247 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,995,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201576.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good15247
July 201376.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good9170
August 201176.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentExcellent9170
August 200976.4Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent9170
August 200776.4Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent9170
September 200576.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good9170
October 200376.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent9170
March 200369.3Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9170
June 200069.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9315
August 199870.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9315
November 199638.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor8411
December 199443.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5200
November 199243.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5200
December 199025.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious5200