RTE I495 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A, 495I


+40.75358, -73.74442
40°45'13" N, 73°44'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I495 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A, 495I
Structure number:000000001055359
Location:JCT I495 & CROSS ISLD PKY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:165.0 ft. [50.3 m]
Total length:329.1 ft. [100.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:104.3 ft. [31.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:115.8 ft. [35.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:146,924 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:86.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$22,447,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201586.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good146924
July 201386.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good146924
July 201186.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good150100
July 200988.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodExcellent122903
July 200788.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent122719
July 200585.8Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent122719
September 200387.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent64799
March 200374.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair68580
January 200074.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair73275
January 199875.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair67851
January 199646.6Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor70677
June 199450.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor55287
September 199245.9Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor157430
November 199050.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor73858