32ND AVENUE over RTE I295, RTE I295


+40.77139, -73.78355
40°46'17" N, 73°47'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:32ND AVENUE over RTE I295, RTE I295
Structure number:000000001055430
Location:1.2 MI S I78+BC1P
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:69.2 ft. [21.1 m]
Total length:130.6 ft. [39.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.7 ft. [18.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,535 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:92.8 tons [84.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.7
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$3,273,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201574.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4535
February 201473.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4535
July 201373.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6500
January 201273.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6500
August 201173.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6500
January 201073.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7758
January 200873.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6586
February 200673.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7758
February 200474.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7758
March 200274.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood7758
February 200072.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7156
February 199861.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair7156
January 199645.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor7100
January 199446.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor4170
January 199345.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor4170
January 199245.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor4170
January 199049.5Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor4170