RTE 25A over RTE I295, RTE I295


+40.75826, -73.77723
40°45'30" N, 73°46'38" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 25A over RTE I295, RTE I295
Structure number:000000001055489
Location:2.2 MI S I78+I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Total length:119.8 ft. [36.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:122.1 ft. [37.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:36,764 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,454,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201659.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair36764
May 201559.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair37333
February 201459.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair37333
August 201344.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor37300
February 201244.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor37300
February 201060.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair32510
February 200860.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair34106
February 200660.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair29670
January 200460.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair29670
February 200261.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair29670
January 200072.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory29670
February 199844.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor29670
February 199628.8Structurally deficientFairFairPoor29670
February 199428.1Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor29670
January 199228.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor29670
February 199033.3Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor29670