Share:

ROCKY HILL ROAD over RTE I295, RTE I295

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.75325, -73.77569
40°45'12" N, 73°46'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ROCKY HILL ROAD over RTE I295, RTE I295
Structure number:000000001055500
Location:2.6 MI S JCT I78 & I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Total length:118.8 ft. [36.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.7 ft. [18.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,324 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:93.8 tons [85.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:55.9 tons [50.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,280,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201574.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8324
January 201474.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8457
August 201363.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory8457
January 201263.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory8457
January 201074.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory8457
January 200874.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9094
January 200674.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8457
January 200474.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8457
January 200273.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8457
January 200062.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7091
January 199862.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7091
January 199646.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor9133
January 199446.8Structurally deficientFairFairPoor12000
January 199227.5Structurally deficientFairFairSerious12000
February 199046.8Structurally deficientFairFairPoor12000