101ST AVENUE over RTE I678, RTE I678, JFK


+40.69398, -73.81182
40°41'38" N, 73°48'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:101ST AVENUE over RTE I678, RTE I678, JFK
Structure number:000000001055680
Location:1.1 MI SE RTE 678+RTE 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Total length:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:83.0 ft. [25.3 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1948
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,784 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$381,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201474.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7784
April 201274.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7800
April 201074.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7784
April 200874.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood9703
February 200674.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood9558
January 200474.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood9558
February 200274.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood9558
January 200073.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6488
January 199872.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6488
January 199660.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair7185
January 199465.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair4320
January 199263.3Structurally deficientPoorFairFair4320
February 199064.3Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair4320