RTE I678 over 907M GCP WEST, 908B TO V


+40.71744, -73.82653
40°43'03" N, 73°49'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I678 over 907M GCP WEST, 908B TO V
Structure number:000000001055750
Location:JCT GCP+ROUTE 678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:122.7 ft. [37.4 m]
Total length:1176.9 ft. [358.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:15
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:137,020 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:58.1
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$33,631,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201558.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair137020
November 201461.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair137020
November 201362.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair137000
December 201262.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair137000
November 201062.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair144623
December 200862.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair144623
August 200662.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair142949
July 200563.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair141358
May 200463.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory141358
May 200363.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory156224
December 200264.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory166440
November 200164.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory166440
June 200075.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory166440
September 199975.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood154679
August 199874.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory153138
September 199645.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor156578
July 199445.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor68857
August 199230.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious189532
November 199045.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor189532