RTE I678 over H.HARDING EXP W, FLUSHIN

Map 

Facts 

Name:	RTE I678 over H.HARDING EXP W, FLUSHIN
Structure number:	00000000105578C
Location:	JCT I495 & I678
Purpose:	Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway and waterway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:	89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:	1287.1 ft. [392.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1963
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:	29
Main spans material:	Steel [3]
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	12,066 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:	13% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:	51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	30.9 tons [28.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	88.5
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:	$15,058,000

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	112,239 [as of 1989]
Truck traffic:	9% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:	Bridge over "tidal" waters that has not been evaluated for scour, but considered low risk. [T]
Operating rating:	47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	22.9 tons [20.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	72.4
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32]
Estimated cost of work:	$17,482,000

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	112,239 [as of 1989]
Truck traffic:	9% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Poor [4 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:	Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6]
Operating rating:	47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:	40.0
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:	$1,875,000

Comments