Share:

RTE I495 over FLUSHING MEADOW

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74345, -73.83715
40°44'36" N, 73°50'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I495 over FLUSHING MEADOW
Structure number:00000000105578E
Location:NORTH JCT OF I495 & I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:73.8 ft. [22.5 m]
Total length:358.9 ft. [109.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,941 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.9 tons [28.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$254,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201487.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood3941
May 201287.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood3366
May 201087.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood3366
May 200887.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood3366
May 200690.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3366
April 200490.7Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3366
June 200285.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood112239
March 200085.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory112239
May 199885.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory112239
May 199665.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair112239
June 199467.8Structurally deficientPoorFairFair112239
September 199249.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor112239
November 199049.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor112239