Share:

ASTORIA BLVD WB over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.76642, -73.89037
40°45'59" N, 73°53'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ASTORIA BLVD WB over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE
Structure number:000000001055840
Location:.8 MI E I278+GCP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:95.8 ft. [29.2 m]
Total length:245.7 ft. [74.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:70.5 ft. [21.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,167 [as of 1999]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.8 tons [80.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$779,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201474.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19167
May 201274.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19167
May 201074.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19167
April 200874.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19167
April 200674.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19167
March 200475.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19167
April 200275.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19167
February 200069.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19167
March 199858.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair19167
April 199637.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor19026
March 199437.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor11350
February 199237.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor11350
January 199040.1Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor11350