+40.76693, -73.88765
40°46'01" N, 73°53'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:DITMARS BLVD over RTE 907M, RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001055859
Location:.9 MI E I278 + GCP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:77.8 ft. [23.7 m]
Total length:152.9 ft. [46.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.4 ft. [30.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,516 [as of 1997]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:93.8 tons [85.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:55.9 tons [50.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,403,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201490.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood23516
May 201290.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood23516
May 201091.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8724
May 200891.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8724
April 200690.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood23516
March 200490.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood23516
April 200293.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood23516
February 200082.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair23516
March 199882.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair23516
April 199664.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor17000
March 199464.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor17000
February 199264.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor17000
January 199062.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor17000