Share:

94TH STREET over RTE 907M, RTE 907M

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.77143, -73.87612
40°46'17" N, 73°52'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:94TH STREET over RTE 907M, RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001055869
Location:1.6 MI E I278+GCP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Total length:199.2 ft. [60.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:86.6 ft. [26.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:2014
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:32,638 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$9,672,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201492.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good32638
March 201292.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good32638
March 201091.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood31620
March 200891.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood31620
February 200692.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood32638
February 200493.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood32638
March 200294.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood32638
January 200093.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood33553
January 199882.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair33553
January 199680.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair27794
January 199466.7Structurally deficientFairFairPoor11000
January 199266.7Structurally deficientFairFairPoor11000
February 199067.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor11000