Share:

RTE I678 over RAMP TO 25AX WB

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.76063, -73.84612
40°45'38" N, 73°50'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I678 over RAMP TO 25AX WB
Structure number:00000000105591B
Location:JCT GCP & I678
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:73.8 ft. [22.5 m]
Total length:698.9 ft. [213.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,225 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:57.9 tons [52.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$658,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201488.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9225
April 201288.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9225
August 201188.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9225
April 201088.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9225
August 200977.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair9225
March 200877.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair9225
June 200777.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair9225
April 200688.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9225
April 200469.5Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory9225
May 200358.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentFairGood9225
June 200262.5Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodGood112239
May 200064.7Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood112239
July 199864.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood112239
August 199632.9Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorPoor112239
July 199435.0Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryPoor112239
September 199235.0Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryPoor112239
December 199034.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor112239