RTE I678 over 25AX E TO 25AX W, RTE 25


+40.76251, -73.84205
40°45'45" N, 73°50'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I678 over 25AX E TO 25AX W, RTE 25
Structure number:00000000105591D
Location:JCT GCP & I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:154.9 ft. [47.2 m]
Total length:776.9 ft. [236.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:12
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,766 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.0 tons [31.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$14,410,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201475.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodSatisfactory10766
June 201264.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodFair10766
July 201164.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodFair10766
July 201064.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodFair10766
July 200864.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodFair10766
July 200675.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood10766
April 200475.2Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood10766
June 200270.4Not deficientExcellentGoodGood86591
May 200070.4Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory86591
20000.0Not applicable---10000
June 199870.4Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryGood86591
June 199635.0Structurally deficientVery GoodFairPoor86591
May 199435.0Structurally deficientVery GoodFairPoor86591
July 199232.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor86591
October 199034.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor86591