54TH AVENUE over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, CORO


+40.74376, -73.84667
40°44'38" N, 73°50'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:54TH AVENUE over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, CORO
Structure number:000000001055950
Location:.3 MI N JCT GCP & I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:80.7 ft. [24.6 m]
Total length:271.0 ft. [82.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:250 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:81.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$555,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201481.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood250
March 201288.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood250
March 201088.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood250
February 200894.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood-
March 200694.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-
March 200483.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-
April 200283.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-
March 200085.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-
April 199896.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-
May 199668.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor-
March 199470.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor-
March 199268.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor-
May 199068.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor-