69TH ROAD over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE


+40.72636, -73.83821
40°43'35" N, 73°50'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:69TH ROAD over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE
Structure number:000000001056000
Location:1 MI SE JCT I495 & GCP
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:220.8 ft. [67.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:10.8 ft. [3.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,086 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.9 tons [25.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$28,926,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201469.4Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood8086
January 201268.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood16600
January 201068.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood16636
January 200868.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood16889
January 200668.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory16636
February 200468.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory16636
March 200275.0Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory16636
January 200075.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14744
January 199863.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair14744
January 199648.8Structurally deficient-FairPoor14744
January 199447.9Structurally deficient-FairPoor6500
January 199264.2Functionally obsolete-FairFair6500
March 199047.9Structurally deficient-FairPoor6500