RTE 427 over RTE 86I


+42.00693, -76.62874
42°00'25" N, 76°37'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 427 over RTE 86I
Structure number:000000001061310
Location:JCT RTS 17 + 427
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Total length:224.7 ft. [68.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Year reconstructed:2013
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:866 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:108.8 tons [98.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:64.9 tons [59.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:98.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$26,884,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201598.2Not deficientVery GoodGoodSatisfactory866
November 201398.2Not deficientVery GoodGoodSatisfactory866
August 201285.5Not deficientFairFairFair1480
August 201084.1Not deficientFairFairFair1830
September 200884.1Not deficientFairFairFair1830
August 200696.3Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1830
August 200497.4Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood1830
August 200297.4Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood1767
October 200098.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1767
October 199898.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1352
September 199671.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor1291
October 199488.8Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryFair1810
September 199288.9Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryFair1067
August 199088.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1067