+42.57119, -78.04050
42°34'16" N, 78°02'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:000000001062450
Location:JCT RTE 436 + GENESEE R
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:94.8 ft. [28.9 m]
Total length:414.7 ft. [126.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1920
Year reconstructed:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Posted for other load-capacity restriction [R]
Average daily traffic:2,259 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.4 tons [17.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:51.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$14,526,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201451.3Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory2259
November 201251.3Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory2250
December 201056.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory2546
December 200856.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory2546
September 200653.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory3477
August 200456.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory2753
July 200255.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory2647
August 200056.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2394
September 199856.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2394
August 199626.4Structurally deficient-PoorFair2068
July 19945.0Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2068
July 19924.0Structurally deficient-PoorPoor3719
September 19905.4Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2120