Share:

JEWEL AVENUE over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.72570, -73.83788
40°43'33" N, 73°50'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:JEWEL AVENUE over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE
Structure number:000000001065010
Location:1.1 MI SE JCT I495 & GCP
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Total length:216.9 ft. [66.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:9.2 ft. [2.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,404 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$23,778,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201472.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood7404
January 201272.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood7400
January 201072.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood7404
January 200871.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood15652
January 200671.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood15418
January 200471.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory15418
January 200273.0Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory15418
January 200073.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory11579
February 199862.1Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair11579
February 199648.4Structurally deficient-FairPoor7000
February 199448.7Structurally deficient-FairPoor7000
March 199262.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair7000
March 199062.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair7000