168TH STREET over RTE 907M


+40.71729, -73.79801
40°43'02" N, 73°47'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:168TH STREET over RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001065070
Location:1.6 MI E RTE 678+GCP
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:99.7 ft. [30.4 m]
Total length:103.7 ft. [31.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,451 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:86.8 tons [78.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.5
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$1,327,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201480.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair9451
February 201280.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair9451
February 201080.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9451
May 200980.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9451
January 200880.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9451
May 200791.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9451
January 200691.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9451
February 200473.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9451
March 200273.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory8633
January 200073.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory8633
March 199862.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8633
April 199644.8Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor8810
March 199459.8Structurally deficientPoorFairFair8810
May 199245.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor8810
July 199061.9Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor8810