RTE 907A over RTE 907A


+40.74386, -73.73271
40°44'38" N, 73°43'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907A over RTE 907A
Structure number:00000000106514A
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:156.8 ft. [47.8 m]
Total length:160.1 ft. [48.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.4 ft. [5.3 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,450 [as of 1977]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.8 tons [80.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.9 tons [36.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$146,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201494.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory12450
May 201294.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory12450
May 201094.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
June 200994.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
March 200894.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
April 200794.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
March 200694.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
March 200494.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
April 200394.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
March 200294.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12450
January 200094.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory12450
March 199894.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory12450
March 199683.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair12450
February 199483.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair12450
April 199283.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair12450
August 199083.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair12450