Share:

92 STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.61631, -74.02627
40°36'59" N, 74°01'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:92 STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001065220
Location:.7MI NE JCT I278+BELT PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:258.9 ft. [78.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,665 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:77.9 tons [70.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$24,240,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201480.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair18665
July 201261.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair18665
July 201072.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory18665
August 200872.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory17434
May 200672.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory18665
April 200473.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood18665
May 200273.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood18665
January 200066.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood18665
January 199855.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair17950
February 199642.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor18661
February 199442.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor22264
February 199242.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor22264
May 199042.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor22264