Share:

FT HAMILTON PKWY over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.62230, -74.02096
40°37'20" N, 74°01'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FT HAMILTON PKWY over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE
Structure number:000000001065250
Location:1.2MI NE JCT I278+BELT PY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:108.9 ft. [33.2 m]
Total length:439.0 ft. [133.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,624 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$22,969,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201459.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair9624
January 201277.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair10774
January 201079.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair10774
February 200890.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10774
January 200690.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10774
January 200488.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10774
February 200272.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood10774
March 200070.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood10774
June 199857.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair5925
February 199658.9Structurally deficientPoorFairFair5925
February 199443.9Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor9700
March 199240.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor9700
August 199040.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor9700