Share:

BAY RIDGE PARKWAY over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.62679, -74.01816
40°37'36" N, 74°01'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BAY RIDGE PARKWAY over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001065270
Location:1.5 MI NE JCT I278 & BELT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:57.7 ft. [17.6 m]
Total length:234.9 ft. [71.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:21°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,981 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:70.8 tons [64.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$19,220,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201492.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory14981
January 201292.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood14981
February 201092.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood14981
February 200892.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood19771
January 200692.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood14981
February 200474.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood14981
February 200274.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood14981
January 200067.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood14981
January 199855.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair15035
February 199677.4Structurally deficientPoorFairFair13646
January 199466.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor10000
February 199266.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor10000
May 199045.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor10000