Share:

OVINGTON AVENUE over RTE I278, RTE I78, RTE I

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.63047, -74.01676
40°37'50" N, 74°01'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:OVINGTON AVENUE over RTE I278, RTE I78, RTE I
Structure number:000000001065290
Location:1.8 MI NE JCT I278&BLT PK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:76.8 ft. [23.4 m]
Total length:278.9 ft. [85.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:14°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,462 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.9 tons [28.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:61.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,690,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201461.7Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor5462
February 201261.7Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor5462
February 201078.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodFair5462
February 200889.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory6086
January 200689.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory5462
February 200489.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory5462
March 200289.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5462
January 200086.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5462
20000.0Not applicable---96933
January 199874.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8132
February 199659.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor8132
January 199444.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor11650
February 199244.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor11650
May 199044.7Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor11650