Share:

RTE I278 over RAMP TO HAMILTON

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66844, -73.99625
40°40'06" N, 73°59'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over RAMP TO HAMILTON
Structure number:00000000106531K
Location:JCT PROSPECT EXPY & I278
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:96.8 ft. [29.5 m]
Total length:236.9 ft. [72.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,673 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:57.9 tons [52.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$135,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201492.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good25673
August 201292.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good25673
September 201092.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good25673
June 200892.7Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent25673
April 200692.7Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent25673
July 200492.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent25673
June 200293.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent94589
February 200095.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent94589
March 199895.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good94589
April 199651.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor94589
June 199453.7Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor94589
May 199253.7Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor94589
December 199051.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor94589