Share:

RTE I278 over NAVY STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.69650, -73.98042
40°41'47" N, 73°58'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over NAVY STREET
Structure number:00000000106539A
Location:3.9 MI SW JCT I278 & I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:257.9 ft. [78.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,600 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,999,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201494.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good10600
February 201287.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood10600
February 201087.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood10600
February 200887.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood10600
January 200687.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10600
February 200487.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood10600
March 200287.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood10600
January 200089.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood10600
January 199877.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory10600
January 199659.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor10600
February 199475.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair10600
April 199275.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair10600
November 199059.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor10600