Share:

BEDFORD AVENUE over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70321, -73.96008
40°42'12" N, 73°57'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BEDFORD AVENUE over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001065460
Location:3.0 MI SW JCT I278+I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Total length:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:26°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,397 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:101.8 tons [92.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:60.8 tons [55.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$289,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201578.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood9397
February 201478.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood8077
June 201378.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood8620
February 201278.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood8200
May 201178.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood8200
February 201078.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood8639
June 200978.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood9835
April 200878.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood9785
February 200678.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood8639
March 200489.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8639
March 200289.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8639
January 200089.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8639
January 199878.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair9329
February 199678.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7600
January 199478.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7600
January 199263.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodFair7600
January 199073.0Functionally obsolete---7600