Share:

SOUTH 5TH STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70891, -73.95697
40°42'32" N, 73°57'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SOUTH 5TH STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001065510
Location:2.5 MI SW JCT I278 + I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Total length:98.8 ft. [30.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.5 ft. [15.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,483 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.6
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$2,839,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201490.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7483
March 201289.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7300
March 201090.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5263
February 200890.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory7355
February 200693.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5263
February 200493.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5263
March 200288.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5263
February 200091.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5263
February 199878.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair4205
March 199663.3Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor4205
February 199462.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor4000
January 199262.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor4000
January 199064.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor4000