Share:

SOUTH 4TH STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70958, -73.95659
40°42'34" N, 73°57'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SOUTH 4TH STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001065520
Location:2.4 MI SW JCT I278 + I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Total length:115.8 ft. [35.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.4 ft. [18.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,088 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:95.2
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$3,588,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201495.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3088
February 201295.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3000
February 201095.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2478
February 200895.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2644
February 200695.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2478
January 200495.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2478
March 200288.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2478
June 200095.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2478
August 199882.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1116
October 199667.8Structurally deficientFairFairPoor1116
October 199448.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor4800
July 199248.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor4800
October 199048.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor4800