RTE I278 over RTE I495, RTE I278, RTE


+40.73440, -73.92229
40°44'04" N, 73°55'20" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I278 over RTE I495, RTE I278, RTE
Structure number:000000001065569
Location:JCT I278 & I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:182.8 ft. [55.7 m]
Total length:587.0 ft. [178.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:96.1 ft. [29.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:105.6 ft. [32.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:148,616 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.0 tons [31.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.9
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$10,866,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201488.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood148616
August 201288.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood142100
August 201088.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood110374
August 200888.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood88101
July 200684.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good110374
May 200484.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good110374
July 200284.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood91327
March 200085.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory91327
20000.0Not applicable---30000
May 199885.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood91199
May 199656.7Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor168639
April 199457.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor124323
May 199264.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor163558
May 199064.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor163558