Share:

PROSPECT PARK W over RTE 27, RTE 27

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.65737, -73.98319
40°39'27" N, 73°58'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:PROSPECT PARK W over RTE 27, RTE 27
Structure number:000000001066080
Location:.9 MI SE JCT I278+27
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Total length:137.8 ft. [42.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:81.0 ft. [24.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,713 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:89.8 tons [81.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,606,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201474.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5713
February 201274.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5713
March 201074.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5713
March 200874.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5800
March 200674.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5713
March 200474.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5713
March 200274.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5713
May 200173.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory5713
April 200074.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5713
June 199862.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair6717
April 199647.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor6717
February 199449.3Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor9800
January 199247.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor9800
January 199047.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor9800