Share:

LAFAYETTE AVENUE over RTE I695, RTE I695

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.83173, -73.82104
40°49'54" N, 73°49'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LAFAYETTE AVENUE over RTE I695, RTE I695
Structure number:000000001066130
Location:.3 MI SE I295+I95
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Total length:173.9 ft. [53.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Year reconstructed:2015
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,340 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.7
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$3,875,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201595.7Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory5340
June 201376.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory5340
June 201176.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory5300
July 200976.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4913
July 200776.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4475
July 200577.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4475
July 200377.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4475
August 200177.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4414
October 199978.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4414
February 199878.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4300
February 199646.1Structurally deficientFairFairPoor4300
January 199431.2Structurally deficientFairFairSerious4300
January 199246.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor4300
January 199050.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor4300