+40.83441, -73.82309
40°50'04" N, 73°49'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:LAYTON AVENUE over RTE I695, RTE I695
Structure number:000000001066140
Location:.1 MI SE I95+I295
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Total length:128.0 ft. [39.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:23°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,739 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:71.8 tons [65.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:86.8
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$4,506,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201586.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory4739
June 201386.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory8770
June 201186.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory8770
July 200986.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory1261
July 200786.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory8770
July 200586.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory8770
July 200386.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory8770
August 200186.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory8740
September 199988.5Not deficientFairGoodSatisfactory8740
March 199889.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory8740
February 199680.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair8740
February 199480.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair2900
March 199264.7Structurally deficientFairFairPoor2900
January 199064.7Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor2900